<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>The Journal of Archaeology &amp; Heritage Studies - Volume - 8 , Number - 1 , 2021</title>
<link>http://repository.rjt.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6744</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 18:40:14 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-12T18:40:14Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>Enhancing Child Education through Positively Organizing Museums</title>
<link>http://repository.rjt.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6786</link>
<description>Enhancing Child Education through Positively Organizing Museums
Piyumi, Ambuldeniya.; Buddhisha, Weerasuriya.
Museums are not just exhibiting artifacts. According to the new museological concepts, it has &#13;
different meanings, objectives, and functions. This study has developed a concept that helps to &#13;
improve child education through museums as its main objective. Further, this study emphasized &#13;
the importance of implementing the educational modules and methods that are currently being &#13;
used in the museums located around the world for the education of Sri Lanka through the &#13;
museums. This research is based on the collected data through the mixed-methods approach and &#13;
firsthand experiences gained through participatory observations. This study focused on theories &#13;
connected with museology, child education, and child psychology. These theories supported the &#13;
development of an effective new model that benefits ethnic harmony, empathy, thinking based on &#13;
equality, nationality, and a better future through personality development, critical thinking, &#13;
education, and enjoyment with the inputs of experiences, sensuality, knowledge, and information &#13;
that could provide through museums.
</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repository.rjt.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6786</guid>
<dc:date>2021-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Origin of Sri lankan Art: Sculptures of Frontspiece (Ayaka)</title>
<link>http://repository.rjt.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6785</link>
<description>Origin of Sri lankan Art: Sculptures of Frontspiece (Ayaka)
Dissanayake, Senarth. Bandara.
The frontspiece of a dagoda is a protrusion, projecting from next to the dome. These mark prime &#13;
examples of Sri Lankan art of sculpture, decoratively depicting symbols. The fronspieces survive intact &#13;
at Kantaka Chetiya in Mihintale, Mirisavetiya Dagobas and Abhayagiriya Dhakshina Stupa in &#13;
Anuradhapura and Digavapi near Ampara. There are remains to be seen at Yatala Dagoba in &#13;
Tissamaharama and Mangala Maha Chetiya in Seruwawila as evidence of the existence of frontspieces &#13;
in the past. The eastern frontspiece is the best out of the frontspieces at Kantaka Chetya, Mihintale &#13;
which, according to Dr. Senerath Paranavitana, are the most ancient of the frontspieces and belong &#13;
to 1st -2nd century AD. Although these are considered the oldest sculptures in Sri Lanka, there would &#13;
have been previous constructions made of perishable material like wood and clay, serving as &#13;
examples to the later granite frontspieces. Most of the sculptures in the frontspieces bear a &#13;
connection to the Ashta Mangala symbols which depict water, fertility and wealth. The dagoba &#13;
represents the physical relics of Lord Buddha among the Uddeshika and Paribhogika aspects. In most &#13;
instances, Ashta Mangala are connected to doorways, the intention being to wish the person passing &#13;
through the doorway Sri prosperity and prosperity in wealth Sri Samurdhi and Dhana samurdhi. &#13;
Therefore, it could be considered that the fronstpiece (Vahalkada) means a doorway. The use of &#13;
words Ayaka, Adimukha, as well as Vahalkada, in written sources signifies a doorway. Furthermore, &#13;
the model of a building on top, considered as the most important part of a frontspice, could be &#13;
identified as a triple door platform. At several places, including Sigiriya, similar triple doors are to be &#13;
seen. The fronstpiece is an important part constructed to convey the devotees, by means of symbols &#13;
and in a circumlocutory way, towards the holy relics inside the inner chamber of the dagoba.
</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repository.rjt.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6785</guid>
<dc:date>2021-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Industrial Heritage in Kandy, Sri Lanka</title>
<link>http://repository.rjt.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6784</link>
<description>Industrial Heritage in Kandy, Sri Lanka
Sri Jayasingha, Vishwa. Mithra. Swarna.
As a result of the Industrial revolution during the British colonial rule, many civil engineering and &#13;
mechanical technical heritages were built in the period between 1815 – 1948 related to Transportation, &#13;
Communication, Plantation industry and public facilities in Kandy and its suburbs. The purpose of this &#13;
research is to study the Industrial heritage created by the British in Kandy and its suburbs related to &#13;
those fields. In this study, primarily library studies were conducted to collect data, followed by field &#13;
exploration, observation and interviews. By the 19th century, with the construction of highways and &#13;
railways in Kandy and its suburbs, it helped to transport the harvests of plantations around Kandy to &#13;
the port of Colombo, and the fertilizers, equipment and workers needed for plantation cultivation &#13;
were easily transported to the upcountry areas. The British built many civil engineering and &#13;
mechanical technical constructions in connection with the highways and railways that were built. &#13;
Also, Construction took place near post offices to carry out communication activities related to &#13;
estates. The British set up factories and installed mechanical equipment to process the produce from &#13;
coffee and tea plantation. What the places that can be identified as Industrial Heritage due to the &#13;
industries and their infrastructure created by the British? Finding out is the research problem of this &#13;
research and this heritage is being rapidly destroyed due to modern development activities and &#13;
focusing on securing this heritage is subject to discussion through this research.
</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repository.rjt.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6784</guid>
<dc:date>2021-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Interference of Mid-Holocene Hunter Gathers to Coastal Shell Bearing  Habitats at Southern Coastal Zone of Sri Lanka</title>
<link>http://repository.rjt.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6783</link>
<description>Interference of Mid-Holocene Hunter Gathers to Coastal Shell Bearing  Habitats at Southern Coastal Zone of Sri Lanka
Suranga, E.G.J.; Gamini, Adikari.
The South coast of Sri Lanka is currently an understudied area of archaeological importance in South &#13;
Asia. The aim of this research paper is to use of Archaeological materials found from shell bed, study &#13;
the cultural patterns of the pre historic people in the Holocene of southern coast of Sri Lanka. The &#13;
south coast is a highly dynamic and evolving coasted system over the Holocene. Major phases of &#13;
geomorphic change occurring along the south coast of Sri Lanka during the terminal Pleistocene &#13;
Holocene epochs. Along the southern littoral of Sri Lanka can be seen submerged shell bed appear to &#13;
be remnants of chenier ridges and plains from Rekawa to Kirinda. Shell middens represent a unique &#13;
archaeological phenomenon and a complex remnant of the prehistoric human-modified landscape. &#13;
Shell midden research has a long history in archaeology and comprises an important component of &#13;
understanding human exploitation of aquatic and maritime resources during the Holocene. &#13;
Kalamatiya and surrounding area identified as the key area of this study. Chronological framework &#13;
suggests human interference with shell bed occurred in several habitation stage in the southern &#13;
littoral area. The first human intervention in the shell bed is reported from Mini etiliya and &#13;
Pathirajawela between 5,200-4600 years B.P. The second human intervention, which dates back to &#13;
4100 - 3300 B.P., provides evidence of the third human intervention on the shell bearing site is reported &#13;
to date from 2800 B.P. According to the current research, natural habitats on shells bearing can be &#13;
classified as shell bearing habitation site or shell bearing midden site.
</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://repository.rjt.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6783</guid>
<dc:date>2021-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
