dc.description.abstract |
Abstract: Wildlife include animals and plants which owe their existence to natural
phenomena or processes that occur autonomously. Anthropogenic activities such as
poaching, wildlife trade, human animal conflict, and deforestation are the factors
which threaten and endanger species. Small populations with limited genetic strength
are more vulnerable to diseases and other disasters in comparison to large and wide-
spread populations. The concepts such as “eco-centrism” as opposed to anthropocen-
trism and the “species best interest” are aimed for the protection of endangered spe-
cies. Eco centrism is nature centered where humans are part of nature and non-human
has intrinsic value. “Species best interest” involves focusing the attention to safeguard
the interest of species, as species have equal rights to exist on this earth without be-
coming critically endangered due to human intervention. On this backdrop the paper
aims to analyze the adequacy of the national legal frameworks in protecting and pre-
serving the wildlife especially the endangered species. The paper utilizes the black
letter of law approach and the international and comparative methodologies. Case
decisions, the constitution, legislations, and conventions constitute primary sources
whereas scholarly articles and journals constitutes the secondary sources. The key
findings of the paper states that anthropocentrism as opposed to eco centrism focuses
on the human interests and that the species best interests and eco-centrism are novel
to the environmental jurisprudence in Sri Lanka and this will leads to the prejudice
of the interests of the other species. The paper finally recommends introducing alter-
native homes for highly endangered species, investing special care and resources to
protect habitats, initiating actions to prevent the “genetic swamping” of wild species,
undertaking a programme of ex-situ captive breeding and rehabilitation in the wild
for critically endangered species, publishing flora and fauna species status papers pe-
riodically to protect the endangered wild species in Sri Lanka. The paper concludes
that, the high time has come to enact a separate legislation to reduce the extinction of
the wildlife. |
en_US |