ASSESSING WATER QUALITY USING A COMPOSITE INDEX: A STUDY IN KOTAGALA WETLAND, NUWARA ELIYA, SRI LANKA

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jayasekara, J.M.A.U.
dc.contributor.author Dayawansa, N.D.K.
dc.contributor.author Mowjood, M.I.M.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-01-17T07:59:12Z
dc.date.available 2024-01-17T07:59:12Z
dc.date.issued 2023-12-19
dc.identifier.citation Proceedings of International Conference on EcoHealth Nexus: Bridging Cascade Ecology and Human Well-Being en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-624-5884-24-
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.rjt.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6670
dc.description.abstract The Kotagala wetland plays a vital role in provisional, regulating, cultural and supporting ecosystem services. Since the water in this wetland is used for a vari- ety of human functions, a periodic chemical and physical quality assessment of its water appears to be required. This study used a Water Quality Index (WQI) to assess the level of water quality since it was designed to integrate multiple criteria and their dimensions into a single score. Water samples were collected from six selected inlets and one outlet in the wetland for a duration of ten months from November 2021 to August 2022 with monthly intervals. The following seven parameters were measured and used to generate WQI: Nitrate, Phosphate, Total Sus-pended Solids, Total Dis- solved Solids, pH, Electrical Conductivity, and Salinity. According to the calculated WQI for separate locations, two locations fell under “Poor” water quality status, and all other locations were counted under “Good” water quality. However, the study re- vealed that the sampling location's proximity to urban areas indicated “Poor” water quality. According to the calculated monthly WQI, the values ranged from 45.8 in February to 113.3 in December. The minimum value of WQI appeared in the driest month. It shows the minimum water pollution experienced in the driest month. A sig- nificant relationship was identified between the WQI and rainfall (P=0.002). The wet- land's mean WQI was calculated to be 75.5, which is considered as a “good” quality water. While certain inlets exhibited "Poor" water quality, the overarching water qual- ity of the entire wetland was consistently classified as "Good," highlighting its effec- tive role in regulating water quality. The results demonstrated the wetland's capacity to regulate water quality. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Rajarata University of Sri Lanka en_US
dc.subject Ecosystem service en_US
dc.subject Water quality inde en_US
dc.subject Wetlands en_US
dc.title ASSESSING WATER QUALITY USING A COMPOSITE INDEX: A STUDY IN KOTAGALA WETLAND, NUWARA ELIYA, SRI LANKA en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search RUSL-IR


Browse

My Account