DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION CONTRADICTIONS IN SRI LANKA: A CASE STUDY IN BUNDALA NATIONAL PARK

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jayathilaka, D.M.S.C.M.M.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-01-17T10:15:15Z
dc.date.available 2024-01-17T10:15:15Z
dc.date.issued 2023-12-19
dc.identifier.citation Proceedings of International Conference on EcoHealth Nexus: Bridging Cascade Ecology and Human Well-Being en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-624-5884-24-
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.rjt.ac.lk/handle/123456789/6685
dc.description.abstract Aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of upper catchment develop- ment activities on the Bundala National Park (BNP), Hambantota and the livelihoods of buffer zone villages. Bundala is the first Ramsar Wetland in Sri Lanka in the South- ern tip of Sri Lanka. To evaluate the ecological impacts of development projects on the conservation of BNP, a literature review and a field survey was conducted with the participation of selected key informants from the surrounding villages of the parl. BNP consisted of five shallow Brackish-water Lagoons. Generally, brackish water has more dissolved solids than fresh water and less than seawater. Bundala wetland is fed by two catchments: Malala Oya and Embilikala Oya. Besides these two, Kirindi Oya is one of the other major catchments developed as the Kirindi Oya Settlement and Irrigation Project (KOSIP) in the Late 1980s. Before the KOSIP, Bundala and other surrounding villages were sparsely populated due to the harsh climatic condi- tions and water scarcity. As a pro-development strategy, the KOSIP was introduced. As a result, new settlements and cultivation fields developed over the upper catch- ments of BNP and gradually waste irrigation water flow to the lagoons increased. Findings highlighted that the pH values of the main lagoons were closer to seven, and the electric conductivity level was lower. This affected aquatic habitats and reduced species living in the lagoons, challenging the Ramsar title and fishermen’s income. Further, KOSIP caused reduced forested areas and grasslands in the vicinity. The curd industry declined due to the reduction in grasslands, which increased illegal access to the BNP grounds for grazing, further deteriorating the habitat. Overall, 22% of buffer zone residents had to find alternative livelihoods due to restrictions and environmental changes. To overcome these two major issues, integration of the views of the com- munity in protected area management and implementation of development projects are recommended en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Rajarata University of Sri Lanka en_US
dc.subject Conservation en_US
dc.subject Bundala national par en_US
dc.subject Development; People-protected area relationship en_US
dc.title DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION CONTRADICTIONS IN SRI LANKA: A CASE STUDY IN BUNDALA NATIONAL PARK en_US
dc.title.alternative DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION CONTRADICTIONS IN SRI LANKA: A CASE STUDY IN BUNDALA NATIONAL PARK en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search RUSL-IR


Browse

My Account