FEED UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY OF SLOW-GROWING INDIGENOUS CHICKEN RAISED FOR MEAT PRODUCTION

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kumari, K.G.N.H.
dc.contributor.author Getamanna, G.A.K.N.
dc.contributor.author Kumari, M.A.A.P.
dc.contributor.author Nayananjalie, W.A.D.
dc.contributor.author Adikari, A.M.J.B.
dc.contributor.author Somasiri, S.C.
dc.date.accessioned 2025-04-30T08:20:03Z
dc.date.available 2025-04-30T08:20:03Z
dc.date.issued 2024-11-20
dc.identifier.citation 16th Annual Research Symposium-2024 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2012-5623
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.rjt.ac.lk/handle/123456789/7382
dc.description.abstract Feed utilization efficiency (FUE) is a critical metric assessed through feed conversion ratio (FCR) and residual feed intake (RFI), both essential for devising strategies to reduce high feeding costs in the poultry industry. This study evaluated the FUE of slow-growing indigenous chickens raised for meat production under two systems: the Pasture Raised System (PRS) and the Intensive Rearing System (IRS). The PRS (treatment) included six replicates, while the IRS (control) had three replicates. Both groups were provided with identical cereal-based diets (starter, grower, and finisher), based on age. Daily feed intake (DFI) and weekly body weight were recorded to calculate daily body weight gain (DBWG), FCR, and RFI. Results indicated that DFI was significantly higher (p<0.05) in the IRS group during both the grower (0.069±0.001 kg) and finisher (0.098±0.001 kg) stages compared to the PRS group (0.053±0.001 kg and 0.083±0.001 kg), respectively. Similarly, DBWG was significantly greater (p<0.05) in the IRS group during both grower and finisher stages (18.99±0.66 g and 16.79±0.66 g) than in the PRS group (14.24±0.46 g and 14.72±0.46 g). However, overall FCR values were not significantly different between the two systems (PRS: 4.28±0.20; IRS: 4.62±0.28). Further, RFI was negative and significantly lower (p<0.05) in the PRS group during both stages (-0.0206±0.006 kg and -0.0205±0.010 kg per bird) compared to the IRS group (0.0474±0.009 kg and 0.0265±0.014 kg per bird) where it was positive. In conclusion, these findings suggest that birds in the Pasture Raised System consume significantly less feed, making it a more efficient option for meat production compared to the Intensive Rearing System. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Faculty of Agriculture, University of Rajarata en_US
dc.subject Cereal-based diet en_US
dc.subject Feed conversion ratio en_US
dc.subject Intensive rearing system en_US
dc.subject Pasture-raised system en_US
dc.subject Residual feed intake en_US
dc.title FEED UTILIZATION EFFICIENCY OF SLOW-GROWING INDIGENOUS CHICKEN RAISED FOR MEAT PRODUCTION en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search RUSL-IR


Browse

My Account